![]() ![]() This past spring, his defamation lawsuit against NPR, CNN, and several journalists at those outlets was voluntarily dismissed “with prejudice”-meaning he can’t refile the case at all. Henry, who now works for the Steve Bannon-affiliated fringe-right channel Real America’s Voice, hasn’t had much luck in the courts of late. “At the time of the filing of the photographs, there was no employment relationship - nor any ‘ongoing economic relationship’ -whatsoever between Henry and Eckhart.”Īttorneys for Eckhart and Henry did not immediately respond to requests for comment. “Retaliation claims under both statutes are confined to the employment context, or at the very least, to situations where the parties had an ‘ongoing economic relationship,’” the judge wrote. While the “revenge porn” and sex trafficking charges against Henry will continue, Abrams agreed to dismiss some of the retaliation counts since at the time Henry publicized the photos he was no longer an employee of Fox News. She additionally claimed that when she didn’t consensually agree to sex, the married host “sexually assaulted her on office property, and raped her at a hotel where Fox News frequently lodged its visiting employees.” In her complaint, Eckhart accused Henry of having “groomed, psychologically manipulated and coerced” her into a “sex slave” relationship. ![]() It has not, for instance, imposed a gag order, or held that the photographs may not properly be considered at the appropriate time.” But the Court has not denied him of that right. ![]() ![]() “He certainly has the right to defend himself publicly - and do so zealously. “There is no doubt that the factual allegations in the complaint are inflammatory, and the Court recognizes that Henry vehemently denies them,” she wrote. She did inform Henry’s attorneys, however, that they should seek the court’s permission before submitting the photos as evidence. While the judge said in her ruling this week that Eckhart’s “revenge porn” allegation would move forward, Abrams let Henry know that he could still potentially use the images as part of his defense once the case goes to trial. We look forward to proving through the discovery process that FOX News Media takes harassment allegations seriously and acted appropriately.” Eckhart’s allegations against Ed Henry, Fox News Media immediately commenced a thorough independent investigation and within six days dismissed Mr. “As we have previously stated, upon first learning of Ms. “We remain committed to defending against the baseless allegations against Fox outlined in Jennifer Eckhart’s claims,” Fox News Media wrote in a statement last fall. Henry’s legal team, meanwhile, has maintained that filing the images was a “reasonable defensive measure” to combat Eckhart’s “inflammatory” allegations. Henry was later accused of “slut-shaming” Eckhart when his legal team added 15 explicit photos to a court filing that sought to dismiss the ex-Fox employee’s lawsuit, prompting Eckhart to file the “revenge porn” count and additional retaliation charges. Weeks after Henry was fired from Fox News in July 2020, following a complaint of “willful sexual misconduct in the workplace,” Eckhart filed a brutal lawsuit alleging the veteran reporter raped her and “performed sadistic acts on her without her consent that left her injured, bruised and battered with bloody wrists.” Henry vehemently denied all claims. District Judge Ronnie Abrams also ruled that ex-Fox associate producer Jennifer Eckhart's accusation of sex trafficking against Henry could continue, though the judge did toss out several counts of retaliation against Henry for filing salacious and “intimate” photos of Eckhart on the public docket. Disgraced former Fox News anchor Ed Henry’s motion to dismiss allegations that he violated New York’s so-called “revenge porn” statute against his sexual assault accuser was rejected by a federal judge this week. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |